I also read about "urban" star shots. One blog, Long Exposure Tips, discussed using a 50mm prime lens and opening up the aperture to f/2.8, lower the white balance to 2500K and shoot at a low ISO. This seemed bizarre to me as you typically need a high aperture with a long exposure so it doesn't create too bright a photo. I tried this a few times and found that the stars end up blurry and if the exposure goes to long, you get small streaks instead of stars.
I noticed on my long exposures of the sky, especially the third shot below, I am getting small red dots across the photo. Are these airplanes or a problem with my camera/lens? They seem to be in the same place on every photo. I was pleased how the sky in the long exposures of the second and third photos still stayed a dark blue instead of brightening up like the first photo. I adjusted the white balance on these photos to a lower level (Tungsten light, Approx. 3200K). I'm not too sure how to use these settings or even how to create my own. Maybe we will learn some of this in future classes. Here are a few of the better photos from this week:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5221/e52211ad3318263abca9aac921d421357eee85ca" alt="Star streaks"
6,404 second exposure, f/18, 50mm, ISO 100
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51368/513680d08aa30315764d27f0bf4bd047ce501279" alt="Orion's belt"
45 second exposure, f/2.8, 50mm, ISO 100
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe002/fe002e28bcc979fbfcf7338f99c7d7b6953dd5aa" alt="Tracks"
2,759 second exposure, f/22, 18mm, ISO 100
No comments:
Post a Comment